Welcome to the GIGABYTE Forum, the right place to ask questions about GIGABYTE products, search for solutions, share your experience with other users. Please login or register.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, search of the whole forum, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

   

80073 Posts in 10587 Topics by 18795 Members
Latest Member: Manddrakke
Official GIGABYTE Forum  |  Questions about GIGABYTE products  |  Motherboards with AMD processors  |  What's the difference between AMD's 1055T 125 watt version and the 95 watt versi « previous next »
Poll
Question: Which AMD 1055T CPU would you prefer to own and why?
AMD 1055T 125 Watt - 0 (0%)
AMD 1055T 95 Watt - 2 (100%)
Total Voters: 2

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Author Topic: What's the difference between AMD's 1055T 125 watt version and the 95 watt versi  (Read 3307 times)
soarwitheagles
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 17
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 826



« on: October 19, 2010, 02:51:40 am »

Hi all!

A couple of months back I found a super deal on an AMD 1055T 125 watt CPU/motherboard combo. Now I see the 95 watt version of the 1055T is hitting the markets strong.

Can someone here tell me the difference between the two [other than 30 watts difference]? What are the pro's and con's of each version [Is one really a lot more energy efficient]?

Is there really all that big of a difference?

I placed a poll on this post to see the various opinions and comments so I can learn more.

Thanks,

Soar
Logged

AMD 1055T
GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3
XFX 6870 DD
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
HAF 932

Intel i5-3570
ASRock Z77 Extreme4
GeForce 560Ti
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
CM HAF X Blue

Both Systems:

Windows 7+8
Scythe Temp Monitor + Fan Controller
autotech
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 22
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 724



« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2010, 04:35:52 am »

personally, the 95 watt will work on more motherboards. To me the 125 usually overclocks better. L2 is 256 instead of 512 like the 125 watt l3 appears the same 6 mb. Also doesnt seem to be very many of them in usa yet.  I  like the 125 watt procesors myself but thats me you asked the difference and thats what i found so far if i find more i will post it.

Absic and dark might have more to add also when they get on it is more aviable over in the UK.
Logged

GA890FXA-UD5\,Silverstone Strider 1000watt\ ,AMD Phenom 2 1090T\ ,4x4gb gskil 1600 ripjaws\,Corsair Force Series 3 CSSD-F240GB3A 240GB SATA III Internal SSD \ windows 7 ultimate 64 bit limited edition\,1 x 6970 2 gig\,Audigy 2 ZS plat. sound card,5.1 creative 550watt speakers,3 500 gig wd platters
soarwitheagles
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 17
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 826



« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2010, 05:00:33 am »

personally, the 95 watt will work on more motherboards. To me the 125 usually overclocks better. L2 is 256 instead of 512 like the 125 watt l3 appears the same 6 mb. Also doesnt seem to be very many of them in usa yet.  I  like the 125 watt procesors myself but thats me you asked the difference and thats what i found so far if i find more i will post it.

Absic and dark might have more to add also when they get on it is more aviable over in the UK.

Autotech,

Thanks for the info.  I found it very interesting!

Soar
Logged

AMD 1055T
GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3
XFX 6870 DD
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
HAF 932

Intel i5-3570
ASRock Z77 Extreme4
GeForce 560Ti
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
CM HAF X Blue

Both Systems:

Windows 7+8
Scythe Temp Monitor + Fan Controller
absic
Gold Helper
Hero Member
*

Karma: 339
Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 5125


Never give up; Never surrender!


« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2010, 08:35:27 am »

Hi Soar,

From my understanding of the 95W versions of the Hex core CPU's is, at the moment in Europe, they can only be bought as part of a package or by System Manufacturers as part of a pre-built system and are not available as stand alone processors.

Of course, that doesn't mean that you can't get them and, as you rightly ask, what are the differences and the advantages. Well, the obvious difference is in the power draw, 95 Watts v 125 Watts this in turn will mean less heat is being generated by the CPU allowing this chip to be used in smaller chassis, HTPC's and the like. Apart from that there are no significant differences that I have been able to find. They still use the same 45Nm Thuban design, have the same cache, use the same amount of transistors and they are basically the same as the 125W version but the drop in power has been achieved through better production values.

AMD are still producing lots of the 125W CPU's hence the reason that the 95W version isn't going to be made widely available on this side of the pond, everyone would want one of these in favour of the 125W version and it would not be good for sales! If you can get hold of one then, it would be the better option.
Logged

Remember, when all else fails a cup of tea and a good swear will often help! It won't solve the problem but it will make you feel better.
soarwitheagles
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 17
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 826



« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2010, 05:44:49 am »

Hi Soar,

From my understanding of the 95W versions of the Hex core CPU's is, at the moment in Europe, they can only be bought as part of a package or by System Manufacturers as part of a pre-built system and are not available as stand alone processors.

Of course, that doesn't mean that you can't get them and, as you rightly ask, what are the differences and the advantages. Well, the obvious difference is in the power draw, 95 Watts v 125 Watts this in turn will mean less heat is being generated by the CPU allowing this chip to be used in smaller chassis, HTPC's and the like. Apart from that there are no significant differences that I have been able to find. They still use the same 45Nm Thuban design, have the same cache, use the same amount of transistors and they are basically the same as the 125W version but the drop in power has been achieved through better production values.

AMD are still producing lots of the 125W CPU's hence the reason that the 95W version isn't going to be made widely available on this side of the pond, everyone would want one of these in favour of the 125W version and it would not be good for sales! If you can get hold of one then, it would be the better option.

Ok, thanks.  Fry's had thousands of the 95 watt version and were selling em' all over the West Coast of California for $149 and they were selling lot hot cakes...very, very fast at that price.

I did not know if it was all that good of a deal and if it was better or worse than the 125 watt version so that is why I was asking.  Thanks for answering my question.

Soar

PS Please send me your Yahoo address.
Logged

AMD 1055T
GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3
XFX 6870 DD
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
HAF 932

Intel i5-3570
ASRock Z77 Extreme4
GeForce 560Ti
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
CM HAF X Blue

Both Systems:

Windows 7+8
Scythe Temp Monitor + Fan Controller
bofh1971
Full Member
***

Karma: 5
Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 115


« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2010, 12:25:37 pm »

Thought I would vote, as a non overclocker, I really like anything that uses less power, and creates less heat, although my office is freezing right now so I think I need to buy a GTX480 Smiley

I am on the 965BE 125w version, which runs as great as any of the 145w version I built a while ago.
As mentioned though, the higher watt versions may be better for overclocking.

Cheers
Bo
Logged

Gigabyte GA-790FXTA-UD5 (forum prize)
Phenom IIx4 965BE, 8GB Corsair 1333 Ram
2x750gb HDD's Raid0, Palit Geforce GTX570
Windows 7 Ultimate, Acer 24" P256H Monitor, Razer Salmosa Mouse,
Microsoft Sidewinder X4 Keybaord
Dark Mantis
Gold Helper
Hero Member
*

Karma: 413
Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 18410


10typesofpeopleoneswhoknow binaryandoneswhodont


WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2010, 12:34:24 pm »

Personally I would go for the lower power version for the same reasons as bofh. I don't tend to do much overclocking and so less power in watts is a bonus as it saves having to dissipate more heat into the atmosphere in my office. Wink
Logged

Gigabyte X58A-UD7
i7 920
Dominators 1600 x6 12GB
6970 2GB
HX850
256GB SSD, Sam 1TB, WDB320GB
Blu-Ray
HAF 932

Gigabyte Z68X-UD5-B3
i7 3770K
Vengeance 1600 16GB
6950 2GB
HCP1200W
Revo Drive x2, 1.5TB WDB RAID0
16x DLRW
StrikeX S7
Full water cooling
3 x 27" Iiy
Wonderwrench
Full Member
***

Karma: 8
Offline Offline

Posts: 162



« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2010, 02:19:22 pm »

30 Watts Grin I just had too!

Bill
Logged

Main Box*i7 930@3.5 Ghz*CM V6 GT*GA X58A-UD3R v2 FB bios*3x4 gig Patriot DDR3 1600 EL*EVGA GTX 460 1 gig*OCZ Vertex 3 MI 120 gig*WD  Blue 500 gig*ASUS DRW-24B3LT*Samsung SH-S223L*Teac Floppy*Corsair AX750*Rosewill R6AR6-BK case*Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit SP1
Dark Mantis
Gold Helper
Hero Member
*

Karma: 413
Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 18410


10typesofpeopleoneswhoknow binaryandoneswhodont


WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2010, 02:20:08 pm »

I knew someone wouldn't be able to resist! Grin
Logged

Gigabyte X58A-UD7
i7 920
Dominators 1600 x6 12GB
6970 2GB
HX850
256GB SSD, Sam 1TB, WDB320GB
Blu-Ray
HAF 932

Gigabyte Z68X-UD5-B3
i7 3770K
Vengeance 1600 16GB
6950 2GB
HCP1200W
Revo Drive x2, 1.5TB WDB RAID0
16x DLRW
StrikeX S7
Full water cooling
3 x 27" Iiy
absic
Gold Helper
Hero Member
*

Karma: 339
Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 5125


Never give up; Never surrender!


« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2010, 02:22:38 pm »

30 Watts Grin I just had too!
Bill

Now that's what I call a grown-up answer. I'm sure that Soar will really appreciate that!  Cheesy
Logged

Remember, when all else fails a cup of tea and a good swear will often help! It won't solve the problem but it will make you feel better.
soarwitheagles
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 17
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 826



« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2010, 10:05:11 am »

30 Watts Grin I just had too!

Bill

LOL!  Ok, smarty pants!
Logged

AMD 1055T
GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3
XFX 6870 DD
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
HAF 932

Intel i5-3570
ASRock Z77 Extreme4
GeForce 560Ti
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
CM HAF X Blue

Both Systems:

Windows 7+8
Scythe Temp Monitor + Fan Controller
autotech
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 22
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 724



« Reply #11 on: October 24, 2010, 12:55:08 am »

I have been searching all over for an actuall one on sale in america at frys or anywhere else and all i can find are smoke and mirrors and at the end its still the 125 watt they are offering for sale. I dont think anyone in america actually has one for sale yet. Click on the links at frys or anywhere else and see what i mean. Kinda fishy i got my info on the different cache straight from amd site.
Logged

GA890FXA-UD5\,Silverstone Strider 1000watt\ ,AMD Phenom 2 1090T\ ,4x4gb gskil 1600 ripjaws\,Corsair Force Series 3 CSSD-F240GB3A 240GB SATA III Internal SSD \ windows 7 ultimate 64 bit limited edition\,1 x 6970 2 gig\,Audigy 2 ZS plat. sound card,5.1 creative 550watt speakers,3 500 gig wd platters
absic
Gold Helper
Hero Member
*

Karma: 339
Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 5125


Never give up; Never surrender!


« Reply #12 on: October 24, 2010, 11:58:51 am »

I got my info on the different cache straight from amd site.

Yes, it can be a bit confusing and I have made similar errors in the past. The problem is that sometimes suppliers, along with AMD, give the L3 Cache which is 6Mb whilst the total cache is actually 9Mb if you include the L1 & L2 cache as well.

As I mentioned in my earlier reply, in Europe, these 95 Watt CPU's are supposed to be only available as part of a pre-built system or a bundle and that is the only way I have seen them advertised so far. Of course, they will eventually come onto the open market via other sources but AMD are not intending to sell these as PIB's as they do with their other CPU's.
Logged

Remember, when all else fails a cup of tea and a good swear will often help! It won't solve the problem but it will make you feel better.
soarwitheagles
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 17
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 826



« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2010, 05:30:31 am »

I have been searching all over for an actuall one on sale in america at frys or anywhere else and all i can find are smoke and mirrors and at the end its still the 125 watt they are offering for sale. I dont think anyone in america actually has one for sale yet. Click on the links at frys or anywhere else and see what i mean. Kinda fishy i got my info on the different cache straight from amd site.

Autotech, Fry's sold a very large quantity of the 95 watt version of the 1055T on 10.14.10 in their one day sale ad.  They sold out fast because:

1. There is such a high demand for them
2. They had dropped the price to $149.99
3. It was the retail version [so it came with the fan/heatsink too]

Tiger Direct is now selling the OEM version [no fan/heatsink] here for $189.99 and they have lots and lots of them:

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-Details.asp?afsrc=1&EdpNo=6455299&sku=A79-1155&srkey=A79-1155&SRCCODE=LINKSHARE&cm_mmc_o=-ddCjC1bELltzywCjC-d2CjCdwwp&AffiliateID=lw9MynSeamY-l.2ygaDR0m3r3ccr3b72Uw

Here are the two different numbers so you can differentiate between the 95w or 125w:

HDT55TFB6DGR = 125w

HDT55TWF6DGR = 95w

The only difference in the number is that the 95w has a "WF" whereas the 125 has a "FB" in it!

Soar


* TD 1055t.JPG (200.35 KB, 993x874 - viewed 91 times.)

* TD 1055t 2.JPG (192.87 KB, 822x940 - viewed 72 times.)
Logged

AMD 1055T
GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3
XFX 6870 DD
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
HAF 932

Intel i5-3570
ASRock Z77 Extreme4
GeForce 560Ti
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
CM HAF X Blue

Both Systems:

Windows 7+8
Scythe Temp Monitor + Fan Controller
soarwitheagles
Hero Member
*****

Karma: 17
Offline Offline

United States United States

Posts: 826



« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2010, 06:03:42 am »

Thought I would vote, as a non overclocker, I really like anything that uses less power, and creates less heat, although my office is freezing right now so I think I need to buy a GTX480 Smiley

I am on the 965BE 125w version, which runs as great as any of the 145w version I built a while ago.
As mentioned though, the higher watt versions may be better for overclocking.

Cheers
Bo

Thanks for your input Bo!  Since it is now nearing winter here, I am glad I have the 125 watt.  Perhaps I can purchase the 95w for summer time!  Grin  Tongue
Logged

AMD 1055T
GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3
XFX 6870 DD
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
HAF 932

Intel i5-3570
ASRock Z77 Extreme4
GeForce 560Ti
OCZ ZX-850 Watt Gold
Corsair Vengeance 1600 16GB
CM HAF X Blue

Both Systems:

Windows 7+8
Scythe Temp Monitor + Fan Controller
Pages: [1] 2 3
Official GIGABYTE Forum  |  Questions about GIGABYTE products  |  Motherboards with AMD processors  |  What's the difference between AMD's 1055T 125 watt version and the 95 watt versi « previous next »
    Jump to: