EP45-UD3LR and high temperatures

[chernobyl]

“Problem” is-different temperatures.
3rd party software(HW Monitor) shows very high temperatures to cpu and system:
CPU:Core#0 +55C-idle and +70C load
         Core#1 +46C-idle and +60C load
         Core#2 +52C-idle and  +65C load
         Core#3 +58C-idle and  +70C load

EasyTune6:
system temperature:+39C idle and +46C load
cpu temperature:      +33C idle and +39C load

gpu +51C idle and +68C load

BIOS vF11:
System temperature +39C idle and +45C load
cpu temperature:      +33C idle and +45C load

Question is:Should I believe 3rd  party software or EasyTune6/BIOS information?

And my hardware is:
Motherboard:Gigabyte EP45-UD3LR
CPU:Intel Q8200 2.33ghz-CPU Cooler Zalman CNPS7000-Cu
Graphcard:Gigabyte GTX470 SOC 1280mb
RAM:8GB Kingston ddr2 800mhz
PSU:Cooler Master GX 750W
Case:Cooler Master HAF 912+ fans:2x200mm+2x120mm
 

[Dark Mantis]

Hi

I would say that you should try CoreTemp or RealTemp for an accurate measurement of the temperatures. There will always be a difference between the seperate core temperatures but the reporting programs should agree.

[chernobyl]

Thank you.. Why there is so big difference HWMonitor and BIOS temperatures?

[Dark Mantis]

My first thought would be that maybe the programs are not up to date, the latest versions because that is often the case for reporting the wrong values.

[chernobyl]

I have always latest versions

[Dark Mantis]

Well maybe HWMonitor is lying to you! I really don't know why the discrepancy but tyhe important thing is to check and see which reading is accurate.

[chernobyl]

Thank you... maybe there is big and bad ****l behind this conspiracy 

[Dark Mantis]

Yes maybe! As I said if you try the other two programs it will enable you to see which was the most accurate previously.

[chernobyl]

I googled this "diode vs. socket CPU temps". and there is many very interesting articles.

[Dark Mantis]

You will always get variations because of the analogue versus  digital sensors.